comex wrote: >Amend Rule 2160 by replacing 'POSSIBLE' with 'LEGAL'. At best this is a recipe for confusion. We have carefully chosen situations where something is POSSIBLE but ILLEGAL in order to avoid getting into a mess. This change would call into question many such actions, in a crisis, solely on the grounds that they were performed by deputisation. More concerningly, I think this would render POSSIBLE a lot of actions that are currently IMPOSSIBLE but LEGAL. Most things are LEGAL.
-zefram
