Rule 1551 says, in part:
When a document is ratified, the gamestate is modified so that
the ratified document was completely true and accurate at the
time it was published. Nevertheless, the ratification of a
document does not invalidate, reverse, alter, or cancel any
messages or actions, even if they were unrecorded or overlooked,
or change the legality of any attempted action.
The recently ratified Assessor's Report lists two dependencies
on CFJ 1688 in the history (left untouched by the second sentence of
the above excerpt), but not in the totals (which may or may not be
affected by the first sentence):
1) My VCs. Totals are not in question, as I spent myself down
to zero on May 31 either way.
2) Human Point Two's (V,E)VLOP. Total would be 10 if CFJ 1688
is judged TRUE, 8 if it is judged FALSE.
If CFJ 1688 is judged FALSE, then I'll likely CFJ on the following:
* Human Point Two's VLOP increased from 0 to 10 between May 30
and June 2.
* Human Point Two's EVLOP is 10.
I recommend a proposal to clarify this paragraph of Rule 1551 (which
Proposal 5101 does not attempt to alter), and solicit suggestions for
how it should be clarified.
