Zefram wrote: > It is, of course, true that because the Primo charter is a binding > agreement governed by Agoran law the rules of Agora could modify it > arbitrarily.
I am not finding anything that allows this under the current ruleset, and arguably R101(v) actually prevents it, especially as agreements are now allowed to include "persons" who are not players. The proposal process is only considered protective of player's rights to consent to changes in the rules, not agreements in general (R1503), and the passage of a proposal does not sufficiently guarantee that persons who are not players have had the reasonable opportunity to review the change, as R101(v) requires. Of course it's true that arbitrary modifications to Agoran rules could lead to a ruleset which would allow Agora to make arbitrary changes to agreements, but that's not relevant. -Goethe
