[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >[With the return of disinterested proposals, we can go back to rewarding >non-ordinary interested proposals, yes?]
Hmm. There's still possible inducement to vote contrary to one's conscience. There is no longer the incentive to vote AGAINST a good proposal, if the proposer has made it disinterested. But there's still the incentive to vote FOR a bad proposal in order to distribute the rewards. Anyone could propose, interested with AI=2, "All my friends are coauthors of this proposal. Amend rule 2152 ...", with the coauthor bonus providing a reason to vote FOR a scam that breaks the obligation to follow the rules. Minting arbitrary amounts of VCs otherwise takes AI>=3. I'm not sure whether I'd vote against allowing interested democratic proposals due to this. In principle it compromises the democratic nature, but the effect is slight. >Amend Rule 2126 (Voting Credits) by removing "ordinary". Which instance of it? -zefram
