Zefram wrote:
comex wrote:
If there are complications, Zefram did
not mention them when calling this CFJ.
The only complication is that at the time GreyKnight believed that e could
not legally assign a judge to those CFJs. Per CFJ 1604 e was mistaken,
but of course that judgement didn't exist then.
We used to have a rule preventing punishment if the player reasonably
believed eir (in)action wasn't a violation. We might want to revisit
that concept (preferably after "Judicial Cleanup" is applied).