Zefram wrote:
Kerim Aydin wrote:
Well, if a proposal can deem something that's not defined/regulated,
I don't think it can, in any lasting fashion. It was Michael who argued
that deeming constitutes an instantaneous change to the persistent
game state.
More accurately, I argued that a proposal was explicitly granted the
ability to make any change to the game state (indeed there were words
to exactly this effect). The question was whether or not "deemings"
were part of the game state.
I think there's a pretty good argument to the effect that the
coat-of-arms proposal set our coat-of-arms to be <whatever>, and that
this was then a change to the game state. In the absence of any
countervailing change, it should still be the case that our
coat-of-arms is <whatever>.
Michael.
