On 5/13/07, Michael Slone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What if someone is simply recalcitrant and maintains that Peter Abelard is always an eligible voter if no list of eligible voters is provided? Here it seems that the failure of public agreement is contingent and that it is the intent of the individual rather than the ambiguity of the description which prevents public agreement.
You, sir, are cited for the use of domain-specific meanings in a general context. :P -- Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "You can't prove anything." -- Gödel's Incompetence Theorem
