Power inflation should be fairly easy to control, being that a single AGAINST vote cancels out four FOR votes. I don't see this as being an issue.
BobTHJ On 5/9/07, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On May 9, 2007, at 1:01 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: OscarMeyr wrote: Change the power of R101 to 4. You see, Zefram, the power inflation begins. What we really should do is deflate others of power-3 to power-2. But no one does that. We survived perfectly well for a long time without power- 4 Rules. Where do we go next? Fight inflation! I vote AGAINST proposal 4968 (precedence takes precedence). Would it be as effective, and without the power inflation, to have R1482 state that it takes precedence over all other rules? And the same for R101? ----- Benjamin Schultz KE3OM OscarMeyr
