Kerim Aydin wrote: > If an action is attempted which is regulated but illegal, it > is taken to be a successful action, but it breaks the rules > defining the action as illegal. If an action is attempted > which is regulated, not explicitly illegal, but otherwise > against the Rules, than attempts to perform it are unsuccesful.
I think it's dangerous to change interpretation in such a blanket manner. I think it would be better to define formal terminology by which individual rules can explicate illegal vs impossible, and then amend rules piecemeal to use the formal structure. -zefram
