OscarMeyr wrote: > According to the Clerk of the Court archives and the agoranomic.org > archives, which I consider the best available information for > researching this CFJ, here is the relevant timeline:
Beware the databases! They are not designed to hold the paradox and thus miss out on things. The Stare Decisis is, well, incomplete. > 18 Dec 2006 15:44:10 UTC CFJ 1594: Goethe recused > As long as this recusal > is not challenged as invalid -- and I see nothing in the Stare > Decisis questioning that recusal -- This recusal is in fact in question, and in fact questioning it is the subject of CFJ 1594. If you reject Goethe's judgement, then this line didn't occur, which means you should accept Goethe's judgement, which means this line did occur... etc. Or do I have that wrong? I've kind of lost track. -Goethe
