Kerim Aydin wrote:
>(see CFJ 1575 for
>a more far-fetched forcing that worked).
Interesting. In reading through the judicial rules when I registered, I
perceived considerable wooliness around such issues, so I'm not surprised
by problems like that.
>It is interesting to note that (I think) earlier versions of the
>ruleset did not explicitly list DISMISS as a judgement, and in
>fact there was a question on whether a DISMISSED case had been judged.
The oldest CFJ rules have "UNDECIDED" or (later) "UNDECIDABLE" as legal
judgements, up to 591/2. From 591/3 to 591/17 only "TRUE" and "FALSE"
are legal judgements. "DISMISSED" appears only in the present 591/18.
>perhaps you have a copy of R591/16 to see how it read?
Yes:
----------
Rule 591/16
A Judge judges a CFJ by sending eir Judgement to the Clerk of
the Courts. The Judgement of a CFJ must be either TRUE or
FALSE. Only the Judge assigned to a CFJ may Judge that CFJ.
As soon as possible after the receipt of a legal Judgement, the
Clerk shall distribute the Judgement to the Public Forum.
If a Judge delivers Judgement on a CFJ before the end of
the assigned deliberation period, then the Clerk of the
Courts shall pay out to the Judge the Judicial Salary as
soon as possible after the publication of eir Judgement.
History:
...
Amended(16) by Proposal 3998 (harvel), May 2 2000
----------
> I would say that it isn't, and plan on assigning judges
>accordingly.
I won't argue against that.
-zefram
