Kerim Aydin wrote: > > Michael wrote: >> > I was talking about the "we", not the modified quote.
>> Indeed, but isn't the "we" part of the quote? > Their use was not Royal, but rather anti-Royal. Rather! I guess I'm not a collection of famous dead Americans, so maybe my "we" came across as Royal. I'll have to be careful: certainly I wouldn't want to come to be known as a purveyor of wes. Michael.
