Joshua Boehme wrote:
> I'm assuming players fall under the definition of "Rule-defined entities".
> What's interesting is that there are patent titles which still exist under
> the rules and are assigned to Chuck, so it's possible e is still defined to
> some degree in relation to those.
...meaning e could cause a series of CFJs as soon as e registers. It seems
very Agoran, somehow...
There a bit of a precedent (or at least some opining on one in the last
paragraph) in CFJ 1520:
http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=1520
-G.
