Michael wrote:
repeal 1505 ?? think I have to do this though it was
just usefully amended, and though the
indicative name is now wrong... ??
Oh, arrggh. First draft repealed 1505 then second draft amended it, I missed taking out the repeal. In general I'd argue that the wrong indicative name with the right rule number was still clear, so I can't really claim it's unclear in the case of this accident.
Panick in the streets! Crime has no punishment! Riots, riots, anarchy!! -Goethe
