OscarMeyr wrote:
My intent was to forestall issues that came up back in the days of currencies and fees, where if someone didn't properly phrase their payment of a fee, or they didn't accurately state the fee, their action usually failed.
All those happened because of things like "paying" and "pay out" and just "transferring" currency being different rules-defined concepts, so confusing these did create ambiguity between different rules-defined actions. As long as there's only one thing to do that's like expending or spending or paying you should be fine.
Maud is right, that R754 claims precedence over other rules governing lanaguage, so that weak "may" is probably overruled by 754 anyway and would have no effect at all.
(By the way, Goethe, your MUA keeps breaking subject lines and dropping references. Is it fixable?)
Unfortunately no, cutting and pasting from the archive is the only way for me to email from this address these days. Sorry! -Goethe
