Kate wrote:
As the judicial backlog seems to be becoming untenable, judging by
recent chaos, I remove my sleeping cap and instead don a green
eyeshade...
I deputise for Arbitor to recuse kiako from CFJ 4129 on grounds of
lateness.
I assign CFJ 4129 to Murphy.
CFJ 4129 was called by Janet and reads: "On or about 2025-10-29 15:23:35
UTC, 4st issued a doubt on a document."
Original CFJ and caller's arguments:
https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2025-November/054808.html
I reject the caller's arguments. Rule 2201 merely requires a doubt to
explain the scope and nature of a /perceived/ error, even if it turns
out not to be an actual error. 4st's message met that standard.
Rule 2201 also requires the doubt to identify a public document. 4st's
message did not do so explicitly, but the doubt was immediately followed
by "Response: Illuminator's weekly report", and the immediately previous
Illuminator's report clearly matched all three perceptions (whether
errors or not), so I find that it was reasonably unambiguous.
I judge TRUE.
--
[ANSC H:GE]
