CoE on the purported distribution of Proposal 9284: the text, an
essential parameter, was not correctly specified (in that the quotation
marks have been replaced with other characters), so the distribution failed.
I respond by publishing the following as a revision of the distribution
mentioned above.
{
I initiate a referendum on each of the following proposals, removing
them from the proposal pool. For each referendum the vote collector is the
Assessor, the quorum is 5, the adoption index is that of the associated
proposal, the voting method is AI-majority, and the valid options are FOR
and AGAINST. (PRESENT and conditional votes are also both valid votes.)
ID Author AI Name
-----------------------------------------------------------------
9284~ juan 1.0 Protecting Farmer's
Sovereignty
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Legend:
NNNN*: Democratic proposal
NNNN~: Ordinary proposal
NAME+: Coauthors listed below
The full text of all above mentioned proposal(s) is listed below. Where
the information shown below differs from the information shown above,
the information shown above shall control.
==========
ID 9284
Protecting Farmer's Sovereignty (AI=1.0)
author: juan
coauthors:
[Argument: The low price for destroying a crop makes it so players that
are not engaging with this subgame can effectively sabotage it without
playing at all, since everyone gets basically 2000 Pyrite every month.]
In the paragraph of Rule 2710 that reads
Once per Crop Season, a player CAN pay a fee of 1000 Pyrite to remove
a type of out-of-season Crop.
replace the number “1000” with “10000”:
}
CoE on the report on the Proposal Pool: the Proposal Pool contains a
proposal entitled "Protecting Farmer's Sovereignty".
I deny the claim.
