I vote as follows: > 9247~ Murphy 1.0 Allow no-ops
PRESENT. The status quo is that this would only be an infraction under No Faking if someone did it intentionally. I don't really see an issue with this. -- Janet Cobb Assessor, Rulekeepor
Janet Cobb via agora-business Sat, 06 Sep 2025 21:08:55 -0700
I vote as follows: > 9247~ Murphy 1.0 Allow no-ops
PRESENT. The status quo is that this would only be an infraction under No Faking if someone did it intentionally. I don't really see an issue with this. -- Janet Cobb Assessor, Rulekeepor