On 3/6/25 10:06 AM, Kiako via agora-business wrote:
9222* Mischief, Kate 3.0 Codify the Loophole
Conditional: FOR if Proposal 9223 has been adopted or the outcome of the the
referendum on it would be ADOPTED were it resolved now; otherwise, AGAINST.
(If I'm not mistaken, should this pass on its own, I do not think it would
not actually codify the loophole, but extend the impact of that loophole
from 14 to 21 days. I am however not against the idea of widening the
window, which 9223 does should this pass. Also, thanks for the grammar on
this one, Janet!)
Oh bother, I wrote it backwards.
I change my vote on 9222 to AGAINST.
--
Mischief
Collector, Illuminator, Notary, Prime Minister
Hat: steampunk hat
Vitality: ghostly
Bang holdings: 0
