On 2/11/25 5:12 AM, juan via agora-discussion wrote:
Mischief via agora-discussion [2025-02-07 18:44]:
On 2/6/25 8:20 AM, juan via agora-discussion wrote:

That's why I created a civic duty rewarding scheme for deactivations
that no one seemed to notice.

For those of us drawing a blank here, could you remind us?

I created a contract rewarding deactivations with stamps. Where is it? I
don't know.


You created it on 2023-10-17 [1] and amended it on 2023-10-20 [2]. It looks like it just never got picked up in the Notary's report [3], as it's not even mentioned in the history.

As far as I can tell, the promises section of the Notary's report self-ratifies (R2618 + R2698), but the pledges and contracts sections don't. ("X is the recordkeepor of Y" implies that X's report contains Y, but the reverse -- which is how R2608 does it -- doesn't necessarily hold.)

Thus, I issue a CoE on yesterday's Notary report: the report should show the "Registrar Standard Contracting" contract, as amended. I'll publish an updated report momentarily.


[1] https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg45459.html

[2] https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg45472.html

[3] https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg13631.html

--
Mischief
Collector, Illuminator, Notary, Prime Minister
Hat: steampunk hat
Vitality: ghostly
Bang holdings: 0

Reply via email to