I vote as follows: On Sun, Jun 23, 2024 at 6:58 PM secretsnail9 via agora-official < [email protected]> wrote:
> If you vote on a proposal, please edit this spreadsheet with your votes: > > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1F39OHtBlZlQ8XVccqKCFtP-DPuHz4wPnujxbxkCN3LI/edit?usp=sharing > > ID Author(s) AI Title > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > 9125~ 4st 1.0 (n/a) > AGAINST (Not sure why we'd want to do this) > 9126~ Mischief 2.0 More Stone Cleanup > FOR > 9127~ Mischief 2.0 There Aren't Many Stone Idioms in > English > AGAINST (This is funny, but I'd rather it have a more understandable name/have utility attached) > 9128~ Janet 2.0 Stone cost reset v2 > FOR (this should be well timed since Janet just won with stones) > 9129~ Janet 1.0 Amendments are hard, okay? > FOR > 9130~ Janet, Gaelan 1.0 Revision numbers, revised > FOR > 9131~ Mischief 1.0 Rare Stamps > AGAINST (An interesting idea, but as-is it would just make it easier to get stamp score wins. Not only does it just make some stamps more valuable, it also gives everyone an extra scoring option to use each week, which is part of the bottleneck for scoring. In addition, the increase in score actually isn't super substantial, (usually only up to a 20% increase in score compared to the normal formula). It's an increase in complexity (having to check if there's only 1 of a stamp) for not much benefit.) > 9132* Mischief, Janet 3.0 Fashionable Manners v1.1 > FOR (hooray for consistency) > 9133* snail 3.0 Last from the Past > FOR (also for consistency's sake) -- snail
