(I think there's 5 proposals here, 1 Yellow Ribbon, and 4 awards.)
I submit the following proposals:
{
Title: Yellow Ribbon Comeback
Adoption Index: 3.0
Author: 4st
Co-author:
[For context, Yellow Ribbons used to exist for Tournaments,
but were removed for some reason? Let's add them back.]
Amend Rule 2438 ("Ribbons") by adding the following ribbon to the list,
between Orange and Green:
{
- Yellow (Y): When a player is a Gamemaster of a tournament that has a
winner, or when e earns the patent title Thesis Reviewer, that player
earns
a Yellow ribbon.
}
Amend Rule 1367 ("Degrees") by appending the following:
{
When a player is awarded a Degree, that player CAN award one
or more players the patent title Thesis Reviewer, and e SHOULD
only do so if e feels those players contributed to earning that degree.
}
}
{
Title: Janet Yellow Ribbon
Adoption Index: 3.0
Author: 4st
If the yellow ribbon exists, award Janet the Yellow Ribbon.
}
{
Title: Murphy Yellow Ribbon
Adoption Index: 3.0
Author: 4st
If the yellow ribbon exists, award Murphy the Yellow Ribbon.
}
{
Title: nix Yellow Ribbon
Adoption Index: 3.0
Author: 4st
If the yellow ribbon exists, award nix the Yellow Ribbon.
}
{
Title: ais523 Yellow Ribbon
Adoption Index: 3.0
Author: 4st
If the yellow ribbon exists, award ais523 the Yellow Ribbon.
}
[Presumably, I missed some players, or perhaps, I was too lenient?
I was unsure so I did them all separately...
Either way, I'm not even sure if we should be filling in past Yellow
Ribbons?
But if we are, I suppose we should add/remove some players to this.
If we are adding, we can just have a separate proposal, and removing,
we can just vote against.]
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 11:51 AM 4st nomic <[email protected]> wrote:
> Something like
> "The herald CAN award, with 3 support, a player spendies/patent title/new
> ribbon. The herald SHOULD only do this for significant involvement in
> Thesis Drafting, Thesis Review, and/or Tournament Conductation."
>
> To incentivize the production of tournaments (to conduct science LIVE),
> thesis submissions (to advance the science) and review (to improve feedback
> cycles).
>
> The 3 support is to prevent scamming it; presumably, there would be at
> least 2 but hopefully 3 people reviewing theses or involved in a tournament.
>
> I want a better acronym for it than ASERA (All I came up with was ARSE and
> that is not the right direction however humous), and not sure what
> the reward should be, but I prefer a Patent Title or a ribbon, as that
> sticks around a bit and lets new players know without searching that such
> players are available to do such things, and that such things are
> encouraged in the first place (degrees are encouraged right now via ribbon,
> but the other aspects of the degree process are not, similarly, a ribbon
> used to exist for conducting tourneys and no longer does)
>
> --
> apathy (4ˢᵗ)
>
> Uncertified Bad Idea Generator
>
--
apathy (4ˢᵗ)
wearing Jester's Cap
Uncertified Bad Idea Generator
