On 4/10/24 11:13, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> I submit the following proposal:
>
> Title: Welcome package fix, again
>
> Author: Janet
>
> Coauthors: Aris
>
> Adoption index: 1.0
>
> {
>
> Amend Rule 2499 ("Welcome Packages") to read, in whole:
>
> {
>
> When a player receives a welcome package, if e has not received a
> welcome package, including under any previous definition, since e last
> registered nor in the last 30 days, e gains the following assets:
> * One stamp of eir own type.
>
> A player CAN, by announcement, cause a specified player to receive a
> welcome package (syn. "grant" em a welcome package).
>
> }
>
>
> [Clarify the issues identified with welcome packages previously. There
> has been discussion of adding pro-rated spendies, but that will be done
> separately.]
>
> }
>
I withdraw the above-submitted proposal.
Title: Welcome package fix, again
Author: Janet
Coauthors: Aris
Adoption index: 1.0
{
Amend Rule 2499 ("Welcome Packages") to read, in whole:
{
When a player receives a welcome package, if e has not received a
welcome package, including under any previous definition, since e last
registered nor in the last 30 days, e gains the following assets:
* One stamp of eir own type.
A player CAN, by announcement, cause a specified player to receive a
welcome package (syn. "grant" em a welcome package).
}
[Clarify the issues identified with welcome packages previously. There
has been discussion of adding pro-rated spendies, but that will be done
separately. Only a formatting change from V1.]
}
--
Janet Cobb
Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
