Fine, I CFJ: "jimmy's recent attempt at registering is unambiguously successful"
On Sunday, April 9, 2023, Janet Cobb via agora-business < [email protected]> wrote: > On 4/9/23 10:08, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-business wrote: > > I don't have any damning evidence but I believe that "jimmy" is a > currently > > registered player. As such, they couldn't have registered again (R869, > only > > the unregistered can register) > > > > I intend to ratify without objection: {The person who recently went by > the > > name "jimmy" has not ever registered as the player named "jimmy"} > > > I object. > > That's unlikely. Most players would know not to do such a thing. Also, I > don't think this would work, one doesn't register "as" a specific > player. Even if it is the case that this was an existing player, the > Cantus Cygneus would still be valid, and the recent registration attempt > being unsuccessful wouldn't change that. > > -- > Janet Cobb > > Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason > >
