On 2/4/23 22:29, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> I submit the following proposal:
>
> Title: Restore immunity
>
> Adoption index: 2.0
>
> Author: Janet
>
> Coauthors:
>
> {
>
> Amend Rule 2643 ("Collecting Stones") by prepending the following paragraph:
>
> {
>
> A stone is immune if it has been granted immunity, as defined by other
> rules, since the last collection notice or if it is currently owned by
> Agora. The designation of stones as immune and the granting of immunity
> are secured.
>
> }
>
>
> [This was deleted for some reason. Also, secure immunity.]
>
> }
>

I withdraw the above proposal.

Title: Restore immunity v2

Adoption index: 2.0

Author: Janet

Coauthors:

{

Amend Rule 2643 ("Collecting Stones") by prepending the following
paragraphs:

{

A stone is immune if it is defined as such by the rules of power not
less than 2.

A stone is immune if it has been granted immunity since the last
collection notice. The granting of immunity is secured.

A stone is immune if it is owned by Agora.

}


[The definition of immunity was deleted for some reason; readd it, but
rephrase it so that it's clear the Hot Potato's stone additional
condition works. Also, secure immunity.]

}

-- 
Janet Cobb

Assessor, Mad Engineer, Rulekeepor, S​tonemason

  • BUS: [proposal] Why Janet Cobb via agora-business
    • Re: BUS: [proposal] Why Janet Cobb via agora-business

Reply via email to