That article's definition seems broken - "AI systems that can generate $100B in profits" doesn't make sense without a timeframe.
Like, technically GPT-3 "can" generate $100B if you ran it long enough. Even a calculator "can" generate that much if used in enough transactions over time. They must have meant something more specific, yet missing from the article, like "$100B per year" - though that's still a very weird way to define intelligence! On Sat, Dec 28, 2024 at 11:24 AM twenkid <twen...@gmail.com> wrote: > > https://techcrunch.com/2024/12/26/microsoft-and-openai-have-a-financial-definition-of-agi-report/ > > LOL > ... > The Sacred Computer - Artificial Mind > http://github.com/twenkid > > *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>* > / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + > participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + > delivery options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> > Permalink > <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T6db2e1f98843706a-Mfc413818832a7b788c91c101> > ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T6db2e1f98843706a-M6aa656e8516841d3a3fa7578 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
