On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 1:33 PM Alan Grimes via AGI <agi@agi.topicbox.com> wrote: > > Dooodz, we cereally need to take a much closer look at this story about > the gubbernment seeking to dominate AI. =| >
I thought Trump was going to remove the regulations around that? > Clearly the control of AGI is the only political issue at this point in time. It's not, but I think it is a much bigger issue behind the scenes in politics than what most people think. > If each of us is to have their own version of deviant fun with the tech then it can't be under centralized control and can't be metered out with an eyedropper as it is right now. The centralized control is harder to enforce unless the hardware requirements are substantially high (as they are now), in which case it will be out of reach for "each of us" to have a version of anyway. It's easier to keep an eye on thousands instead of millions. The eyedropper issue is a result of those hardware requirements as well, not regulation. But of course it does go well together with any kind of censorship or use restrictions. But in America we're unlikely to see any crackdowns under Trump. Trump would rather have the US private sector win the race rather than risk China coming out with a better version. ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/Tf90c5be386b3d4cd-Me58eafc215138785b5e98b3b Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
