Actually, maybe I should call this "Bowery-Kolmogorov Complexity" since there is a genuine degree of originality AFAIK, and people do need to think of it in different terms than KC.
As for the 5 year old who doesn't understand KC, I can only do so much. And, by the way, the concept of KC doesn't solve AGI -- it is merely a measure of an intelligence's ability to solve a particular problem posed by a particular data set. However, the larger and more diverse the data set, the more general is the intelligence. If you do it with an artificial intelligence, and it is general, then you have a measure of its AGI quotient. On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 9:25 AM James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote: > For the benefit of the dim (including those feigning dimness) who might > not get "ID"'s joke: > > As I said in the original post: > > "I believe I've mentioned this *idea* before and repeat it here with > added precision." > > On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 7:14 PM <[email protected]> wrote: > >> And then, if successful, we solved AGI? Wow. So it all came down to a >> simple NOR network with 1 wire and some serial delay. Where is the prize >> page? >> *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>* >> / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + >> participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + >> delivery options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> >> Permalink >> <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T728994814c1a40a0-M40b15c8b0bca21403a25913d> >> ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T728994814c1a40a0-M0db3e3d2268ca3068cd01520 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
