On Wed., 6 Jan. 2021, 3:08 am , <[email protected]> wrote:

> Is this just a chip that speeds up an algorithm?
>
> Speed is one thing, intelligence is another way to be better. I still hear
> no explanation of any AGI. What is it you have?
>

i) Natural General Intelligence was made by nature using brain signalling
physics.

ii)The neuromimetic chip is Artificial General Intelligence done using an
inorganic form of exactly the same brain signalling physics configured in
space the same way doing the exact same 'computations' the brain does.The
neuromimetic chip can't do anything else but AGI.

ii) artificial versions of i) nature is a normal science activity that
happens everywhere else in science _except_ here.

(This is almost word for word from multiple places in the article)
----------
This is about correcting a malformed science by restoring a culturally
accidental omission of a normal empirical science activity.

(This is also throughout the article)
---------
Speed was not the reason for the chip proposal, although the chip will be
at least as fast as natural tissue.
(Not in the article. It could be, but is not germane)
--------

... The motivation for ii) is the normalization of a uniquely malformed
science that at least 2 entire research communities don't realise is broken
and has been broken for 65 years. A broken science that nobody chose. A
broken science that has been generationally trained into everyone so
spectacularly well that it apparently takes a massive computational
study/PhD, 20,000 words, 45 pages, and 10-15 years of effort to fail to
communicate to the affected communities. 😋

Happy to continue fielding these questions. We're both learning from it, I
hope!

Can't help harking back to this, angrier time in the journey ... So much
frustration ...
https://theconversation-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/theconversation.com/amp/the-modern-phlogiston-why-thinking-machines-dont-need-computers-7881?amp_js_v=a6&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQHKAFQArABIA%3D%3D#aoh=16098854529413&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Ftheconversation.com%2Fthe-modern-phlogiston-why-thinking-machines-dont-need-computers-7881

Cheers
Colin

















*Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>* /
> AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + participants
> <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + delivery options
> <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> Permalink
> <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T2f2a092379e757d2-Me0da42aaff3b68f065a10466>
>

------------------------------------------
Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI
Permalink: 
https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T2f2a092379e757d2-Mf87b42cf18089df8fedf82c2
Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription

Reply via email to