I use the topicbox forum to access all the list's emails: 
https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi

As for what I said earlier, hmm, your work does have a point with the 
magnetism, but, can be done without a real chip-brain. Do note, a neuromorphic 
chip, or better a real brain chip that can only do 1 algorithm, is most 
optimized for the algorithm, but it is not critical at first, it's a more later 
step towards AGI once we're done-ish.

You mention 'what is the brain's physics' in your work. The atom / base for the 
brain is context, the lowest layer of the brain only has a-z alphabet memories, 
the rest are built are parts in lower layers ex. 'thank+u".

You viz that we need real organs, real AGI, not a simulated organ or brain. 
Yes. However mainstream AI on chips in robots are real, their sensors and 
motors can let it act/sense in the real world - just look at OpenAI's The Hand, 
or GPT-3, it interacts in our world. Not contained in a computer.

Your paragraph above does not seem to say anything about how to predict the 
next word given training examples. It loops/rambles. And seems to talk about 
how science is done. In that regard though, I will say, science as I know it is 
done 4 ways: a brain either knows answers, else search for it from others, else 
do internal discovery, else external discovery tests, all are data intake. Why 
is real world testing done last if need some more proof? Because internal 
thinking is 10,000 times faster, safer, etc. I've figured out now 85% of AGI, 
and I have only coded like 5% of my design so far. I did not need much coding 
to get far. While I may be in a bit of pit when it comes to coding it and if it 
doesn't work but I am quite sure I got ~85%. What else is there to science? 
Note taking Yes.
Google shows:
 1. *Make* an observation.
 2. Ask a question.
 3. Form a hypothesis, or testable explanation.
 4. *Make* a prediction based on the hypothesis.
 5. Test the prediction.
 6. Iterate: use the results to *make* new hypotheses or predictions
Which essentially is data in > generate out. It just finds patterns, given 
data. It can generate likely good desired data in its brain - that' the whole 
point of a brain!, it does NOT need to do external tests right away for every 
question else that'd be Brute Force Search.
------------------------------------------
Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI
Permalink: 
https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T2f2a092379e757d2-M002986b8446a03ea6a90c774
Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription

Reply via email to