Dear all,

Thank you for the wishes and various suggestions.

I guess it is easier to write a book than to create a functional AI
that substantially exceedes what we have today.

Let me just make a few clarifications on what this book will be about:

These will be my ideas on how to make the next step in AI. Given the way
how I conceived the next generation of AI, it looks like it will require a
concerted effort from many people. Me alone sitting at home coding in C++
or PyTorch will not be enough. A hope is that the book will help motivate
people (and companies too) to concentrate the effort.

The biggest part of this effort is training. Writing the code is difficult
too, but training an already written code is comparably more difficult.
These collective effort for training I have already outlined in
AI-Kindergarten. Hopefully, the book will bring clarity and inspiration to
that.


Danko






On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 2:53 AM F BaOthman via AGI <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I wish you the best of luck
> Fatmah Baothman
> Doctor of AI
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 4 Jun 2020, at 1:49 AM, [email protected] wrote:
>
> 
> @Matt, if his code worked and **then* *we read his book, that wouldn't
> make us understand his book any better. It may make you **sure* *his
> explanation is true, but if the explanation doesn't prove itself without
> requiring code, then that means the explanation doesn't hold up itself and
> doesn't explain all things to make you say "ah". Code takes a long time to
> make and mostly does only what you *already knew* it'd do.
>
> Matt, you work with predictions, an agent can be very sure if he has lots
> of context backing his prediction. I am sure of my AGI design. I don't need
> code. I can fully explain it. What I am missing, I have *no clue* how it
> works. And to code something the idea/egg comes before the hatch.
>
> I can literally get out my paint program and make discoveries, using my
> visual knowledge while draw a network. My brain is able to make a lot of
> really good predictions; I have a good model of physics/ our world, or at
> least the A.intelligence domain.
>
> *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>*
> / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> +
> participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + delivery
> options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> Permalink
> <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T0e5ebbcbbc24ea9f-M86d2ce335293c217332d705c>
>


-- 
Prof. Dr. Danko Nikolić
www.danko-nikolic.com
https://www.linkedin.com/in/danko-nikolic/

------------------------------------------
Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI
Permalink: 
https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T0e5ebbcbbc24ea9f-M7addd90c5774343eda7571b0
Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription

Reply via email to