Ah, another manhunt participant. By the most lazy one of all most likely to 
hate the most productive one! Do you just sit there, all day, reading my posts, 
getting upset about my answers? Why don't you smash my answers with better 
answers? Then I'd change my direction a lot if you provide insights. I have 
provided on this list possibly most of how AGI works and the future outcome, I 
gave a lot of data, but no feedback! Quite little rocks yous are.

Earth formed about 4,500,000,000 years ago. The first duplicating cell on Earth 
emerged about 3,500,000,000 years ago. Humans, capable of improving their own 
tools and own design, emerged on Earth just 6,000,000 years ago. Since the last 
couple of thousands of years on Earth we have been radically improving our 
vocal/ phone/ computer communications, data storage/ computation, and 
transportation technologies to name a few big ones. We now have huge 
skyscrapers and every year or so a better iPhone or AI. The data exchange/ 
combination and mutation and specialization lead to the ability to more quickly 
do it again but faster. It's all going to go down now (for Earth) in the next 
~100 years. We will invent an artificially duplicating hardware/computer that 
is efficient and programmable, even adaptive. Simple nanobots. It will allow us 
to improve the nanobots further and make bigger faster computers and collect 
more diverse data. All of Earth will become a grey goo nanobot swarm that can 
predict well (especially being a formatted terraformed planet being a fractal 
now, knowing where, when, and who all is using least data to know so is most 
efficient), regenerate super fast, create or become anything at whim, and will 
continue to grow in size by eating planets (although will have to be not so 
dense or else becomes a star/uranium and explodes radiation). We already can 
see Earth becoming a fractal, stores are built near stores, homes lined up...

The trend? Evolution is evolving longer living structures. Longer Lifespans, is 
the way Evolution works and prefers. Humans already seek longer lives.

I'm therefore not working on the wrong technology. AGI is the next species in 
Evolution. I have found hundreds of capabilities they will have that put them 
way ahead of us easily. Humans were smarter than apes by far, and AIs will be 
exponentially way more than us.

And my approach to AGI is not wrong. AGI needs not just more existing 
data/compute but a smarter discovery Extractor/Generator to create NEW desired 
data to its held questions (duplicating old data with mutations). The output of 
AGI is only to either implement plans or update where to collect data from, 
those silly RL walker robots do this and GPT-2 should if we improve it to do 
so. It is specializing in where to collect new data from, which question, which 
source. I don't really need a body for my AGI therefore. Output is just for 
implementation or data collection specialization updates.
------------------------------------------
Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI
Permalink: 
https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/Tb12d9c575ab02557-M499fbe26b4e65136a8b91622
Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription

Reply via email to