It would be fairly simple to write a server-client implementing competitive message routing for a text based message pool. I could probably do it in a couple weeks. But then comes the hard part. In order for it to be useful you need a large user base, otherwise nobody will use it. Google couldn't get over this hurdle when they tried to make a competitor with Facebook.
It also wouldn't scale with crypto currency. CMR requires that messages be compressible. Messages are routed to peers with semantically related content as measured by compression. Bitcoin messages are not like that. They have the form "X pays $Y to Z at time T". X and Z are public keys that look statistically random, so you end up sending every message to every peer because all peers are equally close to it. On Sun, Feb 16, 2020, 9:02 PM James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote: > OK. I was just kind of hoping it was close enough to at least turn into > an open source project, given you drew a comparison with Bitcoin. So I > suppose this is more along the lines of a "white paper" for such? Quite > seriously, Nick Szabo (bitgold white paper author precursor to Satoshi > Nakamoto's Bitcoin white papers) has written about the importance of > Kolmogorov Complexity and he just might _get_ the idea. > > On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 7:49 PM Matt Mahoney <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> >> On Sun, Feb 16, 2020, 6:31 PM James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 7:34 PM Matt Mahoney <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> My 2008 design for distributed AGI. http://mattmahoney.net/agi2.html >>>> >>> >>> How far is this from a specification you would accept from a student? >>> >> >> I wouldn't give this type of assignment to a class. Companies with >> trillion dollar market caps have not been able to build AGI, so I certainly >> would not expect this of a student. An AGI design proposal would be purely >> hypothetical. Any assignment I give has to be something I can evaluate >> objectively. >> >> People on this list post their AGI ideas all the time, and anyone else >> who cares tells them why it won't work. Until we have the resources to run >> meaningful tests, that's all we can do. >> >>> *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>* > / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + > participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + delivery > options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> Permalink > <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/Tb135fde0a846b51f-M02a054b9aaa25c71c7004cb7> > ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/Tb135fde0a846b51f-M9c36edb2ddd75c7aa5a21e44 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
