Hi Tim

I'm enjoying your website. Thanks for sharing.

Robert

________________________________
From: TimTyler <t...@tt1.org>
Sent: Saturday, 21 September 2019 01:35
To: agi@agi.topicbox.com <agi@agi.topicbox.com>
Subject: Re: [agi] Simulation

On 2019-09-02 16:39:PM, Matt Mahoney wrote:
> Here are at least 4 possibilities, listed in decreasing order of
> complexity, and therefore increasing likelihood if Occam's Razor holds
> outside the simulation.
>
> 1. Only your brain exists. All of your sensory inputs are simulated by
> a model of a non-existent outside world. The universe running this
> simulation is completely different and we can know nothing about it.
> It might be that space, time, matter, and life are abstract concepts
> that exist only in the model.
>
> 2. Your mind, memories, and existence are also simulated. You didn't
> exist one second ago.
>
> 3. The observable universe is modeled in a few hundred bits of code
> tuned to allow intelligence life to evolve. In this case the speed of
> light is in the code.
>
> 4. All possible universes with all possible laws of physics exist and
> we necessary observe one that allows intelligent life to evolve.

This makes 3 and 4 sound more likely. However, there's a problem with
that argument -

which is that the four cases are not mutually exclusive. 3 and 4 include
1 and 2 as possibilities.


If you try and fix that problem by defining 3 or 4 so that they exclude
1 and 2, then the

argument about 3 and 4 being favored by Occam's razor (if that is still
a thing in the enclosing

world) no longer holds - because they are no longer simpler options.


If this argument about Occam's razor did hold, I think simulism would be
a bit of

a less interesting possibility. However, it isn't a valid argument.

--
__________
  |im |yler http://timtyler.org/



------------------------------------------
Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI
Permalink: 
https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/Taa86c5612b8739b7-Mfce9d65a1731d6faaa6b27b1
Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription

Reply via email to