My code just does what yours does, lol.

>  12 seconds to check the full 132MB for any of 72 words

Hmmm... I am actually not _that_ impressed. Searching 10 MB a second? In
RAM? The search tree should fit in the cache, so that can't be the problem.

On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 at 12:03, <[email protected]> wrote:

> Correct.
> I put the search items in a tree instead of putting the data in a tree.
> The little tree searches the data.
> What exactly does your code do?
>
> I made it faster:
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/5lym9vl2fttrmgd/FasterFastSearch.rar?dl=0
> 268MB becomes 132MB and takes 12 seconds to check the full 132MB for any
> of 72 words (could have set it to ex. 99999 words). It takes 12 seconds no
> matter how many words are being searched for.
> *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>*
> / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> +
> participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + delivery
> options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> Permalink
> <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T44eb904095b7612b-Mc9a90dc86a6e89917679c73a>
>


-- 
Stefan Reich
BotCompany.de // Java-based operating systems

------------------------------------------
Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI
Permalink: 
https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T44eb904095b7612b-M9cd5f148b3c644a11e448af6
Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription

Reply via email to