Try out Clojure, it's a modern lisp. What I can say for it is you get all the libraries of the JVM ecosystem, but you can develop significantly more ambitious projects in less time due the powerful expressiveness and simplicity of Lisp, and with the legibility that comes from a data-first, immutable style of development.
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 9:59 PM Nanograte Knowledge Technologies < [email protected]> wrote: > I was wondering, what is currently regarded as being the best language to > develop AI in? > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Stefan Reich via AGI <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Tuesday, 13 August 2019 21:32 > *To:* AGI <[email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: [agi] Narrow AGI > > None of this are actual downers... they're all just mathematical > exercises. > > ("Almost all strings" is practically just as uninteresting as the > mathematical definition of "almost all numbers".) > > On Sat, 10 Aug 2019 at 23:36, Matt Mahoney <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 9:04 AM korrelan <[email protected]> wrote: > > >Legg proved there is no such thing as a simple, universal learner. So > we can stop looking for one. > > > > With all due respect to everyone involved this kind of comprehensive > sweeping statement is both narrow minded and counter productive. > > While I am being a downer, here are some other things you can't do. > > There is no general procedure for testing software. (Rice's theorem, a > generalization of the halting theorem). > > You can't prove all true statements (Godel, Turing). > > You can't prove most true statements (Legg). > > You can't compress all strings, or even all strings above a certain > length (pigeonhole principle). > > You can't always know if a string can be compressed (Kolmogorov). > > There is no universal induction algorithm (Solomonoff). > > There is no universal reinforcement learning algorithm (Hutter: AIXI). > > You can't both create an agent smarter than you and predict its > behavior (Wolpert: mutual prediction is not possible). > > There is no such thing as recursively self improving software (because > intelligence depends on knowledge and computing power and it gains > neither). > > Sorry, it's math. You can have AGI. You just can't have any shortcuts. > > -- > -- Matt Mahoney, [email protected] > > -- > Stefan Reich > BotCompany.de // Java-based operating systems > *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>* > / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + > participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + delivery > options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> Permalink > <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T1ff21f8b11c8c9ae-Mbb5cdbfd0c3e9f31bcfc3da9> ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T1ff21f8b11c8c9ae-M14f0d16896669cea177c3440 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
