The following - fascinating - lecture provides a view of the REAL state of AGI in the world. The follow-up Q&A raises important thoughts and questions all researchers should be including in their work. If you have something constructive to contribute to this state of AGI, then good.
Else, just catch up and read along for the sake of interest. Thanks Ben. Much appreciated. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zt2HSTuGBn8 [https://www.bing.com/th?id=OVP.KJv8dvNoyrmCl9uVOAd0TAEsDh&pid=Api]<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zt2HSTuGBn8> Ben Goertzel:From Here to Human-Level AGI in 4 Simple Steps<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zt2HSTuGBn8> Talk at Czech Institute of Informatics, Robotics, and Cybernetics (https://www.ciirc.cvut.cz/) on May 21st, 2018 Abstract: AI technology has entered the mainstream of ... www.youtube.com ________________________________ From: Steve Richfield <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, 30 June 2019 20:08 To: AGI Subject: Re: [agi] ARGH!!! Colin, At GREAT risk of representing the opinions of others here ... The AGI argument seems to be that a computer need NOT work anything like brains work to be able to problem solving and "think" - that people here can discover another way, without ANYTHING to guide them, or even suggesting that such a thing might be possible. Working on such a thing seems more an act of faith than an act of science. Indeed, I have pointed out in past postings that AGI has become a religion - to create their own God. Trying to inject science into religion has so far met with universal failure, and I expect no better here. I suspect the best you/we can do is make our case to attract those rare dropins who really ARE interested in science rather than religion, and make weekly postings for newbies to notice - at least until being cast out by the religious freakos here. Notice the calls to cast out Arthur from the group. Steve On Sat, Jun 29, 2019, 8:57 PM Colin Hales <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: On Sun., 30 Jun. 2019, 12:20 pm Costi Dumitrescu, <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: What is the most likely biological cell for an AGI robot to invent first? Please be patient. I will get to my proposed design. Fundamentally, it's a 3D cellular automaton and each cell is literally made of the physics it's made of in the brain except it uses electrons/holes as charge carriers. The design has cell migration, dendrite/axon growth and shrinkage, cell genesis and apoptosis. It has adaptive cell function, action potentials and ephaptic coupling. It has no model. It literally is a brain. But not organic. Patience ! I am more interested in getting everyone to understand AGI is not a computer science project. It's empirical neuroscience. Regards Colin Artificial General Intelligence List<https://agi.topicbox.com/latest> / AGI / see discussions<https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + participants<https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + delivery options<https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> Permalink<https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T87761d322a3126b1-M34143922d607032738fc22f9> ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/Te7e0d9ec1ecb60aa-M7613000d15a26bb8f3aeea4e Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
