A cyberdicy, Bill - the 2015 environment encyclical is for the guts (it
looks like de Chardin is mentioned whenever the topic is not ego
related) - for that is constructive.
At least part of the eschatological views - that randomize calls to
ethics - shall play reversed;
https://www.wired.com/story/ai-could-scan-ivf-embryos-to-help-make-babies-more-quickly/.
Artificial ethology would then become an act of science.
Note on Asilomar: a funny thing is RK (of then Google) actually went
pointing eschatologists to biotech/ GMOs. Insofar, - with three active
alchemies at play - it's a mistery why...
https://www.parliament.uk/documents/lords-information-office/2011/lord-winston-robing-room-lecture-transcript.pdf
Note on the encyclical expectation: Only the stimulus path would be
worth 'walking' back with feeding the switched-topic (environment -
intelligence)
https://www.iso.org/standard/56641.html
(a reach to opening a MSS family on 'Intelligence' - to include both
cognitive & artificial; it appears to be run by ANSI)
On 31.05.2019 23:59, Bill Hibbard via AGI wrote:
On Fri, 31 May 2019, Costi Dumitrescu wrote:
Starbucks mode:
https://futureoflife.org/ai-principles/?cn-reloaded=1
I was critical of these AI Principles:
http://hplusmagazine.com/2017/02/02/asilomar-ai-principles-include-transparency-purpose-means-advanced-ai-systems/
Myrrh mode:
http://www.pas.va/content/dam/accademia/booklet/booklet_robotics.pdf
Thanks for this. Perhaps this will lead to an encyclical
on AI similar to the encyclical on climate.
Bill
------------------------------------------
Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI
Permalink:
https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T533e683eb081c254-Mcf674ba92f0a425c53274d19
Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
