Hi Rob, thanks for the compliment :) I'm sorry, I don't currently engage in abstract reasoning about what constitutes AI. I use that time to actually make AI in actual code.
I use the "operating system approach" now because an OS is an excellent place for an AI. Just the OS needs to be controllable enough from the AI process. I now have that in my Java-based system. I really should put a chat bot in there next :) BTW do you have some other contact? Your mail address is hidden (how's that even work? :)). Many greetings, Stefan On 8 June 2018 at 17:38, Nanograte Knowledge Technologies via AGI < [email protected]> wrote: > Stefan. Awesome job! > > You remind me of the movie: "Along came Polly". > > Respect to you for sticking to it for decades. My journey has thus far > lasted 22 years. > > I can see how some of your existing image-reading code could be applied to > "reading" standardized, system models. Such models are (currently) manually > generated via the application of my tacit-knowledge engineering method. It > could be automated. The models all follow the same convention, and speak > the same, BAA (Blocks And Arrows) "language". This has significant, future > relevance for mainstreaming symbol-driven, UI systems (aka digital, > personal assistants). > > Within my ontology, system models exist irrespective of content. In other > words, they are not data driven, but structured according to > context-relative, policy decisions. If your cat could understand the > meaning of the image (model) it was looking at, it could reverse-engineer > the policy of the image and automatically translate that into processes, > and also assign default functionality to those processes. Such > functionality could easily be pruned to optimum level via a self-recursive > algorithm. > > All these steps could be completed without getting lost in translation > (just a more-fun way to say, with integrity). Such computational functional > would set the baseline for the more-interesting stuff leading towards an > AGI platform. > > **In that manner, a seamless link may be established between any > personalized system (human-thinking based) and generic functionality (in > digital form). - the cat would eventually choose what state it wants to be > in, even adopting multiple states, and new ones invented to degrees, in > parallel. I think, achieving this level of logic sophistication would be > critical to progress towards an AGI platform. > > If forward chaining becomes possible, then so does backward chaining. > > Backward chaining should in theory yield standardized, system models from > any digital source being read by the cat. If that value chain could be set > up computationally, it would mean an AI-enabled mechanism was established > for last-mile knowledge engineering. > > Comments? > > Rob > ------------------------------ > *From:* Stefan Reich via AGI <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Friday, 08 June 2018 3:23 PM > *To:* AGI > *Subject:* Re: [agi] Anyone interested in sharing your projects / data > models > > Hi Duncan! > > I am currently making a Java-based AI-enabled operating system. It runs as > a guest in any normal OS. I am actually switching to it as my main OS right > now. > > I have stuff like a Chrome-compatible browser in it, so it is actually a > replacement for a normal OS. > > The AI part will mean that more and more guesses are made by the system as > you use it, and it will automate things automatically (<< automation > squared!). > > I'm totally looking for testers & coders. It's starting now. > > Try at: http://BotCompany.de > > Oh, and programming it is pretty easy. Many modules are like one screen of > code. List of module sources. > <http://tinybrain.de:8080/tb/search.php?q=type%3A57> > > // > > I also looked at your GitHub pages. Not sure how much I understand yet > though... :o) > > I am using Java instead of Python because it has proper GUI & deployment > to end users is actually feasible compared to Python. And for many other > reasons... > > Cheers > Stefan > > On 8 June 2018 at 13:45, Duncan Murray <[email protected]> > wrote: > > The people in this group have a wide variety of skills and I've seen some > interesting, and confusing approaches. I am a programmer with an interest > in Maths and AI but there are many things posted here that I don't fully > understand. > > A lot of people are keeping things closed to others, which is fine - but > if anyone is interested in sharing your work so far, this group would be a > great place to get some initial feedback. Sure it may not all be positive, > but overall we and you may learn something new or take your ideas in a > different direction. > > I'll start - first, to prove there are no wrong answers I've attached my > first attempt to work out what an intelligent system might look like. It > looks bit naive, but maybe there is something in there might help someone > else? > > Since then, I started working on a framework to try and manage AI > processes, also with limited success. https://github.com/ac > utesoftware/AIKIF > > So, please - send us links to your projects! > > Cheers, > Duncan > > > > > -- > Stefan Reich > BotCompany.de > *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>* > / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + > participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + delivery > options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups> Permalink > <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T731509cdd81e3f5f-M2bd182b8774cd08016691ef0> > -- Stefan Reich BotCompany.de ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T731509cdd81e3f5f-M9e326294fc8ff57553a981c8 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups
