or said another way:

Other than that Mrs. Lincoln, how did you like the play?

--
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com


On Sat, Oct 19, 2024 at 9:38 PM Ken Hohhof <khoh...@kwom.com> wrote:

> It looks like Cambium made a PTP version of the 900 MHz 450, if you can
> find some, and the dual yagi antennas.
>
>
>
> Sub 1 GHz isn’t that useful if it’s unlicensed, especially if there’s
> interference from FHSS smartmeters.  And low FSL and goes through foliage
> means you can see interference from everyone and everywhere.   And
> directional is difficult to achieve at that frequency.  And if the
> installer’s body is within 3 feet of the antenna it throws it off so you
> can’t aim it.  And not really enough spectrum to carry video.  Other than
> that, 900 MHz is just peachy.
>
>
>
> *From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> *On Behalf Of *Chris Fabien
> *Sent:* Saturday, October 19, 2024 8:34 PM
> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Extending home network
>
>
>
> There are a few NSM900 and Rocket M900 up on ebay, prices look like about
> what they cost new 10 years ago!
>
> We sold our M900 gear for surprising prices when we pulled it all out
> maybe 4 yrs ago.
>
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 19, 2024 at 5:58 PM Jan-GAMs <j.vank...@grnacres.net> wrote:
>
> These take me back to the days of potato-chip cans, tupperware, and
> tin-foil, thanks for finding them.  I'm just connecting cameras for a
> security system, 16Mbps is way more than enough.  I need directional
> communication between two points, through woods and rated for
> rain/outdoors.  A nanostation 900 (nsm900) would be preferred but they
> don't make them anymore.
>
> I was hoping the "new" 900 bw radio was referring to an 802.11 outdoor
> radio suitable for ethernet directional links.
>
> On 10/19/24 14:17, Ken Hohhof wrote:
>
> I assume he’s talking about 802.11ah.
>
> https://www.wi-fi.org/discover-wi-fi/wi-fi-certified-halow
>
> If I do a Google search, I get results like this:
>
>
> https://www.amazon.com/Wireless-802-11ah-High-Gain-Ethernet-Transmission/dp/B0CDZF7DVH
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> *On Behalf
> Of *Jan-GAMs
> *Sent:* Saturday, October 19, 2024 4:08 PM
> *To:* af@af.afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Extending home network
>
>
>
> Who makes this "new" 900Mhz BW?
>
> On 10/14/24 17:45, TJ Trout wrote:
>
> There's a new 900mhz based 802.11 something for low bw long range iot
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2024, 5:37 PM Chuck <ch...@go-mtc.com> wrote:
>
> It is to a pump house on the neighbor's lot.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
>
> On Oct 14, 2024, at 6:33 PM, Ken Hohhof <khoh...@kwom.com> wrote:
>
> 
>
> Not new, and I haven’t used them, but there’s this:
>
> https://mikrotik.com/product/gper
>
>
>
> Could you use powerline networking?  I’ve used these:
>
>
> https://www.amazon.com/TP-Link-Powerline-Wi-Fi-Extender-TL-WPA7617KIT/dp/B09L85MFNY
>
> but you could probably use something like this since you don’t need WiFi:
>
>
> https://www.amazon.com/Powerline-Ethernet-Adapter-Extender-TP-Link/dp/B084CZMYNM
>
> This assumes the telemetry board location is on a branch circuit from the
> same electrical panel as the house, and that it is indoors.
>
>
>
> *From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> *On Behalf Of *ch...@go-mtc.com
> *Sent:* Monday, October 14, 2024 7:03 PM
> *To:* af@af.afmug.com
> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Extending home network
>
>
>
> Need to connect a telemetry board to my house home network.
>
> Extending the LAN.  Probably 750 feet away.
>
>
>
> Anything new or better these days for this type of thing?
>
>
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to