I remember quite a few years ago being sick while on vacation somewhere like 
Colorado and going to a local doctor.  He said you just have a bad flu, which 
is a virus so I can write you a prescription for an antibiotic but it won’t 
help.  He seemed surprised when I declined the prescription.  Apparently most 
people want a prescription even after being told it won’t do anything.

 

My family had a similar experience when my wife took the kids to visit some 
friends who had moved to Australia.  My son got an infection and had to go to 
the doctor.  Same day appointment, here use this ointment, very modest charge 
compared to what we’d expect here.  Very different system.  I guess it was like 
an old episode of Marcus Welby MD.

 

From: AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> On Behalf Of Nate Burke
Sent: Monday, July 8, 2024 1:33 PM
To: af@af.afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Happy Holidays

 

Your comments about 'New machines or treatments'  This is all can think of 
https://youtu.be/tKodtNFpzBA

"The Machine that goes 'Ping'"

On 7/8/2024 1:15 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:

Are you talking about Medicare, or something else?

 

I’m 73 and have been on Medicare (Advantage) for several years.  My opinion of 
it isn’t great.  I’m not blaming government or private healthcare or insurance 
companies, and I’m not ready to join Bernie and call for single payer, but the 
system is broken.

 

I think the problem is the combination of government paying but private 
companies getting the money and dictating the care.  My experience is at least 
half the time patient care is not the objective, it’s maximizing the money from 
Medicare.  (Private health insurance also has a similar problem.)  You as the 
patient are not the customer, you are a means to an end.

 

If Medicare will pay for something, you are getting it whether you want or need 
it or not.  And if Medicare doesn’t pay for it, you’re not getting it.  If the 
doctor or hospital has a new machine or treatment and Medicare (or insurance) 
can be billed for it, they will figure out a way for you to get that procedure 
or treatment.  If there are multiple treatments for something you’ve got (like 
surgery, chemo, radiation), expect the various specialists to fight over who 
gets the money, and you can be left feeling nobody cares what’s best for you.  
When you are discharged, they will try to order things like wheelchairs to your 
house from medical supply places that charge the maximum Medicare will pay, 
even if you can get them yourself for half the price, even if you don’t need 
one, the only question is whether the govt will pay for it (and don’t tell me 
they aren’t getting kickbacks from the medical supply place).  And god forbid 
the best treatment is a lifestyle change because they don’t get paid for that.  
Nope, order a procedure or write a prescription.  You’ll also find that 
anything like surgery is an opportunity to run a bunch of blood tests and other 
tests so they can refer you to other specialists in their practice so they can 
bill for more things.

 

I have a more positive opinion of doctors that fix specific things, like 
orthopedic surgeons.  You have a problem, they fix it.  I had hernia surgery 
about 10 years ago, no complaints, other than the pre surgery tests were an 
opportunity to find other things that Medicare might pay for.  Can’t blame the 
surgeon for that, he just doesn’t want you croaking on the operating table 
because you have a heart condition.  And the surgery was at a surgery center 
instead of a hospital.  Given a choice I’ll always pick an urgent care facility 
or a surgery center, rather than a hospital or even worse an emergency room.  
If you need stitches, go to urgent care not the emergency room.  You’ll get 
stitched up quicker and the emergency room will just have a med tech do it 
anyway while the doctor on call sits at the nurses station filling out 
paperwork on the computer.  (Am I being naïve assuming the doctor is doing 
paperwork not playing games?)

 

 

From: AF  <mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com> <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> On Behalf 
Of ch...@go-mtc.com <mailto:ch...@go-mtc.com> 
Sent: Monday, July 8, 2024 11:10 AM
To: 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group'  <mailto:af@af.afmug.com> 
<af@af.afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Happy Holidays

 

I am all for nationalized health care.  But I am old enough that it is right 
around the corner for me.  

My wife just about croaked in Barcelona last summer.  Spent a week in a 
hospital there until I arranged a jail break.  Paid absolutely nothing.  

 

 

From: dmmoff...@gmail.com <mailto:dmmoff...@gmail.com>  

Sent: Monday, July 8, 2024 8:16 AM

To: 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group' 

Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Happy Holidays

 

To the original post: People hung up on college degrees might not be if they 
saw what some of the trades are making.  I’ve been in communications & IT for 
24 years, but if I’d started as an electrical linesman instead then I’d be only 
a few years from retirement.  They are doing hard--and sometimes 
dangerous—work, but they are getting paid big bucks to do it.  People in master 
mechanics programs are also cleaning house right now.  

 

I have a CIS degree.  My experience is that college teaches you about things, 
but not how to do things.  Sometimes you do need that background about the 
topic to be good at doing it, and other times it really didn’t matter.  It’s 
also clear to me that what you get out of college is proportional to what you 
put into it (and I suppose that’s true of life in general), so if someone is 
going to college because it’s expected of them and not because of a real 
interest in the subject then their outcome will be less optimal than if they 
did something they actually liked or at least found engaging.  

 

To Steve regarding funding STEM degrees: I agree whole heartedly with that, and 
it’s something I’ve said in other forums.  Someone told me that funding only 
STEM degrees is equivalent to the government telling people what jobs they can 
have.  Au contraire, the economy is telling people what jobs they can have, and 
this would just be allocating funding according to economic reality.  You can 
get a degree in chemical engineering and still become an English teacher if you 
happen to be good at that subject, and that’s what you really want to do, but 
you’d also have another marketable set of knowledge you can use in other 
contexts. 

 

I’ll take you one step further: I consider myself a conservative (a moderate 
one; a New York conservative), and I’m on board with universal healthcare.  
Let’s do it.  Forget the bleeding heart arguments about it, just look at the 
economic realities.  

1) The systems in other countries result in less health care spending per 
capita.  

2) In countries with universal healthcare their small businesses and startups 
are not handicapped with trying to pay for employees’ health insurance.  Here 
they have to offer insurance to be competitive in the labor market, and it’s a 
major hurdle for having success with a business.  

3) We already put about as much public money per capita into covering people’s 
medical bills as other countries do, and we’re only covering a portion of 
people with specific circumstances.  Either get all meddling fingers out of it 
and let the market figure out what to do, or go all in and rebuild the system 
so it works.  We’re one foot in and one foot out right now and it’s brutally 
expensive and by many metrics it’s not all that effective.  I know some would 
argue more in favor of letting the market handle it, but recall that we’ve done 
that before and we had quacks calling themselves doctors and selling all kinds 
of bullshit to people.  I’m thinking back when Coca-Cola contained cocaine and 
was sold as a medicine.  If you let the market run the show completely then you 
have to accept bad outcomes along with the good ones.  Civil court didn’t fix 
it all then, and I don’t see why it would now either.

 

-Adam

 

 

From: AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com <mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com> > On Behalf 
Of Steve Jones
Sent: Friday, July 05, 2024 7:24 PM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com <mailto:af@af.afmug.com> >
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Happy Holidays

 

I think im one of the only conservatives that is pro free higher education. 
More as an investment than as an expense

 

remove all liberal arts, STEM, not STEAM only (you want an art history degree, 
you can pay for it), 1:1 community service requirement per classroom 
instruction hour, manual labor or degree related community service only, 90% 
mandatory score, 95% mandatory attendance, 100 percent drug and alcohol 
abstinence during the school year, tested biweekly. Zero criminal tolerance. 
You pay on the loan until youve completed the mandatory community service and 
repay all deferments from that time period. Then each year you maintain full 
time employment, 10 percent is waived for 10 years. but that would actually 
require something, so of course it would be too unfair.

 

On Thu, Jul 4, 2024 at 12:52 PM Forrest Christian (List Account) 
<li...@packetflux.com <mailto:li...@packetflux.com> > wrote:

I feel that it's  time for college to go through a major revision.

 

First, I lean quite strongly toward the Mike Rowe worldview in that we need to 
quit telling our kids that they need a college education to make it in this 
world.  Right now if you're in one of the blue collar trades you're far better 
off than a lot of the people who have ms or bs degrees.  There will always be a 
demand for plumbers, electricians, mechanics, and so on.  

 

On the college side, we need to adjust what we teach to provide for a condensed 
program where you cut out most (but not all) of the non-relevant programs.   
Yes, it's hard to learn certain trades without college, but a degree in 
computer science shouldn't need a lot of the liberal arts classes.

 

Finally, we need to reform the student loan program so that we quit graduating 
students with degrees in underwater basketweaving with 6 figure loan balances.  
Right now, lenders are able to loan to anyone without risk and as such there is 
no incentive for lenders or schools to ensure that the students will be able to 
repay their loans from a typical job in the student's chosen degree program.   
This has led to ballooning tuition and overall school costs since there is no 
pressure to keep costs low. 

 

On Thu, Jul 4, 2024, 10:36 AM <ch...@go-mtc.com <mailto:ch...@go-mtc.com> > 
wrote:

With the risk of starting something, I thought I would inject some observations:

 

I do watch Charley Kirk on YouTube for a quick fix of watching him dissolve 
some of the woke ideology being spouted by young college kids.  For me it is 
like junk food for my worldview.  Can only take so much of it, like eating too 
many sweets.  And he can get a bit too alt-right for me at times.   

 

Yesterday he was preaching something that I think he was partially, perhaps 
mostly wrong about.  He is a college dropout and preaches that college is a 
scam and you would be better off just learning to code and find an internship 
that does not require a degree.  

 

I think he is only partially right.  

By and large, most BA programs are probably not worth the money unless they go 
onto grad school.  A BA in art history doesn’t have much value when searching 
Indeed for a job.  It can however get you into law school.  

 

And we all know that if you start and successfully run a WISP you absolutely 
must be an autodidact.  An autodidact with ambition.  Cannot pick up either of 
those at a college.  And do not need college to be a superior ISP or WISP.  It 
does however take a special type of person.   

 

But there are a couple of areas where I know, from personal experience, that 
you really benefit from formal education:

 

1)    Computer Science – the part where you learn hardware theory, operating 
system design, compiler design, advanced data structures, OO methods etc.  
Really hard to pick up this stuff by watching youtube videos.  And really hard 
to get any good at it unless you are forced to do homework and labs.  
Understanding what happens with the hardware, the stack and OS during a 
hardware interrupt is important and not so easy to learn on your own.  Try to 
write some DSP functions from scratch on your own... or perhaps some machine 
code to hand optimize a MCU routine.  Much easier if you had a class on 
assembly.  

 

2)    RF and antennas.  Reflection coefficients and the mastery of Smith 
charts.  EM simulation software and optimization.  S11 and PCB stripline and 
microstrip layout.  Etc etc.  Again, a good autodidact can teach themselves 
anything.  But I tried for years to master Smith charts and it was not until 
college that I finally got to where I could use them.  Now-a-days the software 
does it all for you but you still need to know.  

 

3)    To understand some of this stuff, like DSP etc, you also need some upper 
level math, calculus and trig.  Hard to do on your own.  

 

I also imagine that if you want to get into medical school, classes on 
chemistry, biology etc are essential.  All PE programs will always need degreed 
engineers.  So yeah Charley, if you get a liberal arts degree, I would tend to 
agree with you that your fathers money was probably wasted.  But many of the BS 
degrees are not a scam or waste.  

 

-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com> 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com> 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com


  _____  


-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com> 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com





-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to