I don't think we've really had any major problems with the ethernet ports on the HDs (the ports on the original AF5x are terrible though), most of ours have been pretty solid. And it does help that both ports are usable for data on the HD, so you can have a spare cable connected.
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 3:13 PM Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: > I'm 80% happy with AF5XHD. Radio wise they're great but the ethernet > ports continue to blow chunks. Our only solution to the eth ports is a > short jumper from a NP16. The NP16 is of course fed with fiber. > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 3:18 PM Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> My preferred radios for 5ghz backhauls are the Ubiquiti airfiber 5xHD. >> >> I don't have any personal experience to speak of with Cambium PTP stuff, >> other than ePMP for lower capacity links, but PTP670 is probably the best >> 5ghz PTP radio out there, but it's pretty pricey. The PTP 550 and Force 425 >> look pretty decent too, but I haven't used either of those or heard a whole >> lot from people who have. >> >> On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 1:53 PM Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Two of the local WISPs have asked me what I would recommend in 5GHz to >>> replace their Ubiquiti and Cambium radios for backhauls... >>> One of them tried Mimosa and went back to Ubiquiti... >>> What says the Borg? >>> -- >>> AF mailing list >>> AF@af.afmug.com >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
