It did result in greater cell tower density being fed by fiber.  They told city 
regulators it was needed for 5G so they let them do thing they have never 
allowed before.  

From: Robert 
Sent: Monday, December 27, 2021 10:34 AM
To: af@af.afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Not going to qork

Sounds like it was very expensive marketing, but that's what is going to happen 
when you have that kind of cash flow and are in a frequency bind..


On 12/27/21 7:45 AM, Chuck McCown via AF wrote:

  I have told people for years it is nothing more than marketing.


  Sent from my iPhone


    On Dec 27, 2021, at 8:28 AM, Jaime Solorza mailto:losguyswirel...@gmail.com 
wrote:


     
    Exactly...you can't fool mother na....ah, physics..

    On Mon, Dec 27, 2021, 8:13 AM Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:

      But then, we always knew that. Didn't we? 

      Cells with a 500' radius. Yah, sure. That's gonna work.

      --

      bp

      part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com



      On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 6:10 AM Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com> 
wrote:


        
https://www.sdxcentral.com/articles/news/verizons-5g-mmwave-network-has-a-tree-problem/2021/12/

        -- 
        AF mailing list
        AF@af.afmug.com
        http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

      -- 
      AF mailing list
      AF@af.afmug.com
      http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

    -- 
    AF mailing list
    AF@af.afmug.com
    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com


   




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to