I presume someone finally explained it...
But have you ever seen any police like authority apologize for ignorance?

From: Trey Scarborough 
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2021 11:09 AM
To: af@af.afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT: Missouri Governor Doesn't Understand Responsible 
Disclosure

So the person who created the site and should be liable for gross negligence 
nothing happens to, but the person who discovers it needs to be prosecuted. 
Yeah makes sense... I guess if your a politician or work for one its perfectly 
reasonable to be incompetent and take no responsibility for your mistakes.


On 11/15/2021 7:12 PM, Bill Prince wrote:

  Missouri Governor Doesn't Understand Responsible Disclosure
  [2021.10.18] The Missouri governor wants to prosecute the reporter who 
discovered a security vulnerability in a state’s website, and then reported it 
to the state.

    The newspaper agreed to hold off publishing any story while the department 
fixed the problem and protected the private information of teachers around the 
state.

    [...]

    According to the Post-Dispatch, one of its reporters discovered the flaw in 
a web application allowing the public to search teacher certifications and 
credentials. No private information was publicly visible, but teacher Social 
Security numbers were contained in HTML source code of the pages.

    The state removed the search tool after being notified of the issue by the 
Post-Dispatch. It was unclear how long the Social Security numbers had been 
vulnerable.

    [...]

    Chris Vickery, a California-based data security expert, told The 
Independent that it appears the department of education was “publishing data 
that it shouldn’t have been publishing.

    “That’s not a crime for the journalists discovering it,” he said. “Putting 
Social Security numbers within HTML, even if it’s ‘non-display rendering’ HTML, 
is a stupid thing for the Missouri website to do and is a type of boneheaded 
mistake that has been around since day one of the Internet. No exploit, hacking 
or vulnerability is involved here.”

    In explaining how he hopes the reporter and news organization will be 
prosecuted, [Gov.] Parson pointed to a state statute defining the crime of 
tampering with computer data. Vickery said that statute wouldn’t work in this 
instance because of a recent decision by the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of 
Van Buren v. United States.

  One hopes that someone will calm the governor down.

  Brian Krebs has more.

-- 
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
   


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to