as I understand it its an issue with the 1072s specifically

On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 1:49 PM Matt <matt.mailingli...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Is it something specific with the CCR1072? We have been using the
> CCR1036 units for quite a while and have had no issues. Not doing NAT
> but doing BGP and firewalling etc.
>
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 1:22 PM castarritt <castarr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > We have had a CCR1072 doing all our NAT for years, but lately it has
> been unstable.  Obviously, we can't just turn off connection tracking, so
> it looks like we will be replacing it.  We are looking at switching to a
> CHR solution, but we don't know what kind of hardware would be ideal, or
> how performance would compare to a CCR.  We are pushing ~6.5g of traffic at
> peak, and CPU usage on the 1072 tops out around 25-30%.
> >
> > Maxxwave has their "Vengeance 3" with an 8-core 9900k CPU, or we could
> get a used R630 with 2x E5-2698V4 20-core CPUs for about the same money.
> The 9900k would be faster for single-threaded processes, but the server
> would have way more cores and cache.
> > --
> > AF mailing list
> > AF@af.afmug.com
> > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to