I suspect he and madigan have a foot in a transponder company, this is the dumbest thing i never knew about. I worked for a few years in hotels, staff rape isnt even really on the radar. Now, banging guests, thats a whole other ballgame... just so you know, just cause a beds made doesnt mean that topcover is clean
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 5:57 PM Erich Kaiser <[email protected]> wrote: > Good ol' Prickster... > > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 5:53 PM Steve Jones <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> https://www.safetyandhealthmagazine.com/articles/18848-new-illinois-law-requires-panic-buttons-for-hotel-casino-staff-working-alone#:~:text=New%20Illinois%20law%20requires%20panic%20buttons%20for%20hotel%2C%20casino%20staff%20working%20alone,-September%206%2C%202019&text=Springfield%2C%20IL%20%E2%80%94%20Beginning%20July%201,device%20that%20alerts%20security%20staff >> . >> >> On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 5:16 PM Nate Burke <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I found some regulations that talk about needing to identify the >>> transponder location in the hotel. Our state code I don't think >>> addresses how accurate it needs to be. We're not providing the system, >>> but the hotel owner came to us saying that the guy who is selling him >>> the system wanted to add 90 WIFI devices in the hotel. So that leads us >>> to the 1 per room idea. The actual system integrator is supposed to be >>> calling us. I'm thinking we'll probably give him his own SSID/Vlan for >>> his devices. >>> >>> >>> On 1/19/2021 5:04 PM, Chuck McCown via AF wrote: >>> > I would guess that you have one per room so you can tell where the >>> > panic is happening. >>> > I would not use wifi for it if I wanted it to work every time. Be >>> > better to be UHF I would think. >>> > >>> > -----Original Message----- From: Nate Burke >>> > Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2021 3:39 PM >>> > To: Animal Farm >>> > Subject: [AFMUG] Hotel Panic Button Regulations >>> > >>> > We're in Illinois, and provide Internet/WIFI to a hotel. We're being >>> > told by the hotel owner that there is a new regulation (we don't know >>> if >>> > it's state or federal) that there needs to be a panic button in every >>> > room. >>> > >>> > The guy selling them the system says that it is all WIFI based. 1 >>> > device per room >>> > >>> > It is supposedly only for staff use >>> > >>> > So they're wanting to add a mess of devices to the WIFI in the hotel. >>> > Not really a big deal, there's more than enough capacity. >>> > >>> > But A number of things are not making sense with this: >>> > >>> > Why would a Panic button be WIFI based and not 400khz to a local >>> > receiver? >>> > >>> > If it's only for staff, why is there a need for one in each room and >>> not >>> > just a panic button carried on their person? >>> > >>> > I know others on this list service/manage hotels. Have you heard >>> > anything about this? >>> > >>> >>> >>> -- >>> AF mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
