I think you underestimate the apathy of most Americans On Mon, Dec 14, 2020, 4:55 PM Steve Jones <[email protected]> wrote:
> Scotus is unique in that they arent elected, they ha e a wide berth of > discretion, they are the literal last line prior to violent engagement. So, > say the feds want to add a tea tax on Massachusetts. Massachusetts says > hey, I'm harmed by this. Without a hearing the court says, nope, no merit. > Massachusetts says, hey now, we really think you should hear us out. > Discretion being the key. > > We are at the point of a harbor being a tea kettle in close to 40 million > of the most heavily armed people on the planets minds . Whether what they > think is real, or make believe, it is what it is, and their communications > have been forced out of the public's surveillance, so you never know what > they're going to do next. They're not the kind who wear black clothes, > masks, and disappear right after they do something cowardly like beat an > old man in a wheelchair. They also believe the italian guy pretending to be > latino wasnt kidding. > > Either way > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2020, 4:19 PM Carl Peterson <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I'm not exactly clear as to the train of thought, or even what case/issue >> the SC should hear out. The "case" argued in public is nothing like >> anything presented in any court. It isn't like Trump's lawyers weren't >> given an opportunity. Q. Are you alleging fraud? A. No. Well OK then. >> You can't then go to the PA supreme court and allege fraud. When the PA >> supreme court declines to let you, you can't go to the SC and do the same. >> They will rightly tell you to pound sand. This basic script played out >> over and over again. >> >> On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 3:49 PM Adam Moffett <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> If I'm following Steve's train of thought: he's saying giving the issue >>> a day in court might convince some people that justice was done more >>> effectively than simply dismissing the case. An independent judiciary >>> shouldn't have to consider political angles like that. The cases are being >>> dismissed because they lack standing and/or lack merit. If that doesn't >>> convince people, then neither would taking the case to court and losing >>> it. >>> >>> >>> >>>>> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
