Alito and Thomas think that since there's is the only jurisdiction on such a matter that they have a responsibility to hear the case no matter how stupid it is.  They can make that argument and support it, but it's obviously a minority opinion.

On 12/14/2020 12:59 PM, Steve Jones wrote:
Alito disagrees with you and cites the case law.

Without stating it, he got his tone through on the likely outcome.

On Mon, Dec 14, 2020, 11:35 AM Carl Peterson <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Declining to hear the case because, in the opinion of this court,
    Texas does not have standing, is case law.  The court can't decide
    to hear the case in order to decide that they shouldn't have
    decided to hear the case.

    On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 10:56 AM Steve Jones
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        That's exactly why the supreme court needed to do their job
        and hear it. Then smack it down, I don't like the supreme
        court making decisions out of political expedience as they did
        here (hint the last 3). Hell, these arent even states actually
        at each other, its elected state officials. Scotus needed to
        put case law with a ruling (this wasnt a ruling) in the books.

        There will be violence that could have been avoided. Outcome
        of the "case" would have been the same either way.


        On Mon, Dec 14, 2020, 7:24 AM Adam Moffett
        <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

            There's a school of thought that since their jurisdiction
            is exclusive, the Supreme Court has an obligation to hear
            /any/ case a state brings no matter how flawed it might
            be.  Their feeling is that since there's no higher power
            to appeal to, that they /have /to hear the case so that it
            gets heard.  Thomas and Alito are in that school of
            thought, and that's why they expressed the opinion they did.

            My reading of it is that the only disagreement was whether
            to tell Texas to go away before or after they're allowed
            to file their complaints. Either way, the court
            unanimously told Texas to pound sand.  The only way this
            is unclear is if someone willfully interprets it that
            way.  If someone is inclined it interpret it that way,
            then they would have been unhappy with any outcome.  There
            was absolutely zero chance that the Supreme Court of the
            US would overturn one state's election at the behest of
            another. Especially based on the argument that "their
            election processes hurt us."  If they did that, then
            similar suits would happen every 4 years henceforth.


            On 12/12/2020 10:31 PM, Steve Jones wrote:
            We need to have scotus do their damn job and get case
            law. If they keep punting for politics it will get
            stupid. This team when one snaps out you dont get some
            cross dresser popping through a crowd to bike lock
            someone and scurrying off, you get Oklahoma city. They
            need to shut the shit down or pay the cost of the product
            they purchased.

            On Sat, Dec 12, 2020, 6:24 PM Bill Prince
            <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

                Deep within this troll, the force runs.


                bp
                <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>

                On 12/12/2020 4:10 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:

                Yes, thank you.

                I don’t know what was more bizarre, that music
                video, or Chuck being the one who sent it. Who knew.

                *From:* AF <[email protected]>
                <mailto:[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *Bill
                Prince
                *Sent:* Saturday, December 12, 2020 5:55 PM
                *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
                *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT: Not all Texans are idiots

                bp
                <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>

                On 12/12/2020 2:55 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:

                    Is there a mind blown emoji?

                    -----Original Message-----

                    From: AF<[email protected]>  
<mailto:[email protected]>  On Behalf Of Chuck McCown via AF

                    Sent: Saturday, December 12, 2020 4:30 PM

                    To:[email protected]  <mailto:[email protected]>

                    Cc: Chuck McCown<[email protected]>  
<mailto:[email protected]>

                    Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT: Not all Texans are idiots

                    https://youtu.be/yModCU1OVHY  <https://youtu.be/yModCU1OVHY>

                    -----Original Message-----

                    From: Bill Prince

                    Sent: Saturday, December 12, 2020 3:28 PM

                    To:[email protected]  <mailto:[email protected]>

                    Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT: Not all Texans are idiots

                    First place I heard it was from Molly Wood on Make Me Smart:

                    https://twitter.com/mollywood/status/1169705055194247168?lang=en  
<https://twitter.com/mollywood/status/1169705055194247168?lang=en>

                    
<https://twitter.com/mollywood/status/1169705055194247168?lang=en>  
<https://twitter.com/mollywood/status/1169705055194247168?lang=en>

                    bp

                    <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>

                    On 12/12/2020 12:03 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:

                        I was not familiar with the term banana-pants.  A 
Google search yields

                        lots of results, mostly photos of banana pants, as well 
as some songs,

                        none of which shed much light on the subject for me.  I 
assume it

                        means cra-cra?

                        -----Original Message-----

                        From: AF<[email protected]>  
<mailto:[email protected]>  On Behalf Of Robert Andrews

                        Sent: Saturday, December 12, 2020 1:42 PM

                        To:[email protected]  <mailto:[email protected]>

                        Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT: Not all Texans are idiots

                        This was similar to how the south leaders hauled all 
the regular

                        people into the civil war.  Yes they did a good job 
stirring things up

                        before.

                        On 12/12/2020 11:19 AM, Bill Prince wrote:

                            The people who should really be looking at this are 
the citizens in

                            the states who think it's appropriate for their AG 
to sue another

                            state's election results.

                            The suit was what I would call banana-pants.

                            bp

                            <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>

                            On 12/11/2020 4:19 PM, Jaime Solorza wrote:

                                All these craven lackeys got a big fuck you 
from the SCOTUS...

                        --

                        AF mailing list

                        [email protected]  <mailto:[email protected]>

                        http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com  
<http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>

                    --

                    AF mailing list

                    [email protected]  <mailto:[email protected]>

http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>

-- AF mailing list
                [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
                http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
                <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>


-- AF mailing list
            [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
            http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
            <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>

-- AF mailing list
        [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
        <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>



--

-- AF mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
    <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>


-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to