I wonder if that Hardy guy has an opinion.
On 10/30/2020 9:56 PM, Adam Moffett wrote:
I don't know what the FCC would say, but I'd argue 115' because the
/original/ ground level as it will appear in anybody's elevation data
would not include the 15' mound made when they built the tower.
.....I also don't imagine anybody's gonna climb up there with a tape
measure and double check me.
On 10/30/2020 8:31 PM, Steve Jones wrote:
My biggest issue is what agl is based off of. We just did a link
where they built the ground up 15 feet, are we 115 feet or 100 feet
if the structure is 100 feet tall? How are propagation profiles
accounting for discrepancies like this? Is there and actual way to
calculate amsl?
On Fri, Oct 30, 2020, 3:45 PM Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com
<mailto:dmmoff...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Ok I think I answered that myself. Part 101 calls for accuracy
to +/- 1
meter. I thought someone told me there was more play than that.
On 10/30/2020 4:39 PM, Adam Moffett wrote:
> Isn't there some margin of error allowed on the antenna height
on a
> microwave license? I seem to think +/- 25 feet, but I can't
remember
> why I think that.
>
>
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
<http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com