Friend of mine who is a wisp had a similar situation....turned out he had switch port at one end set to 100mbps...once he switch it to 1000mbps everything was honky dory... Maybe something like that?
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020, 12:01 PM Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote: > This is in the back woods. SNR is reported as 39db. Whether we believe > that's accurate is possibly up for debate, but the physical rate stays > pretty consistently at 390Mbps and CCQ stays above 90%. > > I'm not sure what wall I'm hitting on real throughput though. CPU only > gets to 25% or so during the test. The Ethernet interfaces are gig. I can > get 200Mbps+ testing to the near end of the link, but 90-97 testing through > it one-way. > > > > On 9/10/2020 1:55 PM, Jaime Solorza wrote: > > 80Mhz wide? No interference? What's your SNR? > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020, 11:52 AM Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I don't normally do Mikrotik Wireless, but I inherited a DynaDish 5 >> link. It's at -66 RSSI on each end, 80mhz channel size. >> >> The physical rate is shown as 390Mbps in both directions, but actual >> downstream throughput seems to vary from 90-97Mbps. Is this normal for >> the product? Is there some known optimal config for a Mikrotik PTP? >> >> I fiddled with using 802.11 vs nstream vs nv2, and I got that 90+Mbps >> result on nstream. The other modes seemed to be worse. I'd hate to >> spend any more time fiddling if this is the expected outcome with this >> product. >> >> >> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> > > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
